Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: discontiguous memory platforms | Date | Wed, 1 May 2002 19:59:53 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 02 May 2002 19:56, Roman Zippel wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of > > config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the > > nodes, don't you think? > > Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and > how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot > faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table > approach.
Which dynamic table approach is that?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |