Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 02 May 2002 19:56:30 +0200 | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: discontiguous memory platforms |
| |
Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of > config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the > nodes, don't you think?
Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table approach.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |