Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:56:55 -0500 | From | "Jonathan A. George" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Alexander Viro wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote: > >>Not quite. Linus uses BK as a tool to facilitate kernel development. >> However, he has not made BK _part_ _of_ _the_ _kernel_. ;-) Obviously >>anyone can use any tool ON the kernel, but integrating into the kernel >>is something else. >> >>>Talk Linus out of using BitKeeper, and sure, I'll remove the doc. >>> >>No need. His tools are his choice. The kernel itself is ours not his; >> thus the distinction. >> >> > >Bullshit. His copy is his. Mine is mine. Yours is yours. Each of >us is perfectly within his rights when he adds whatever patches he >likes. > Both statements are true. Imagine that.
--Jonathan--
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |