lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Alexander Viro wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:
>
>>Not quite. Linus uses BK as a tool to facilitate kernel development.
>> However, he has not made BK _part_ _of_ _the_ _kernel_. ;-) Obviously
>>anyone can use any tool ON the kernel, but integrating into the kernel
>>is something else.
>>
>>>Talk Linus out of using BitKeeper, and sure, I'll remove the doc.
>>>
>>No need. His tools are his choice. The kernel itself is ours not his;
>> thus the distinction.
>>
>>
>
>Bullshit. His copy is his. Mine is mine. Yours is yours. Each of
>us is perfectly within his rights when he adds whatever patches he
>likes.
>
Both statements are true. Imagine that.

--Jonathan--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.040 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site