[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:

> Alexander Viro wrote:

> >On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:

> >>No need. His tools are his choice. The kernel itself is ours not his;
> >> thus the distinction.
> >
> >Bullshit. His copy is his. Mine is mine. Yours is yours. Each of
> >us is perfectly within his rights when he adds whatever patches he
> >likes.
> >
> Both statements are true. Imagine that.

So where the hell do you or anybody else get the right to prohibit him adding
GPLed file to his copy?

RTFGPL. Again, if you don't like said additions - fucking tough,
they are explicitly allowed by the license.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.047 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site