[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
    > > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
    > > > > since forgotten the password to my old account ;),
    > > >
    > > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.
    > >
    > > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer
    > > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated
    > > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do
    > > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim.
    > So the offer was not in good faith.

    Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through
    the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged
    on, and refuse to substantiate?

    We can discuss the good-faith issue *after* you answer the questions.
    Larry McVoy lm at
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.022 / U:63.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site