lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
    > > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
    > > > > since forgotten the password to my old helsinki.fi account ;),
    > > >
    > > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.
    > >
    > > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer
    > > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated
    > > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do
    > > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim.
    >
    > So the offer was not in good faith.

    Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through
    the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged
    on, and refuse to substantiate?

    We can discuss the good-faith issue *after* you answer the questions.
    --
    ---
    Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.038 / U:31.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site