[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
> > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
> > > > since forgotten the password to my old account ;),
> > >
> > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.
> >
> > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer
> > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated
> > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do
> > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim.
> So the offer was not in good faith.

Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through
the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged
on, and refuse to substantiate?

We can discuss the good-faith issue *after* you answer the questions.
Larry McVoy lm at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.066 / U:1.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site