[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:55, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:22, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's
> > > > worth pissing off some key developers?
> > > Linus has already explained why he put it into the kernel sources.
> > So far the only argument I've seen is: it's convenient. Did I miss something?
> > The convenience argument is bogus. A url is just as convenient,
> If you say this, then you either missed, or are willfully ignoring,
> what Linus said. Search for the string "".

Linus said:

> As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
> it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
> since forgotten the password to my old account ;),

Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.094 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site