Messages in this thread | | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance | Date | Sun, 10 Mar 2002 02:11:49 +0100 |
| |
On Sonntag, 10. März 2002 02:00:02, Charles Heselton wrote: > How would you implement these thing? I'm not on the same technical level > that you guys are, and when/if things are out of context, I don't follow. > Can you help?
If you are somewhat open for "new" (experimental) stuff I can prepare a patch on top of 2.4.18 or 2.4.19-pre2 for you.
But Andrea Arcangeli informed me that vm-29 had a deadlock bug in the recent fixes for the bh headers. vm-28 is fine or soon to be available vm-30.
It didn't hit me for the last two days.
Regards, Dieter
> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Dieter Nützel > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1156 > To: Dan Mann > Cc: Linux Kernel List > Subject: Re: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance > > > On Saturday, 9. März 2002 18:55:00, Dan Mann wrote: > [-] > > >Machine now feels more responsive than windows 2000 pro machine at work. > > > > Great work guys. > > It's due to preemption and Ingo's great O(1)-scheduler. > BIO should help, too but throughput isn't were it should be...;-) > > You can get this when you apply preemption+lock-break, O(1) and Andrew > Morten's low-latency to 2.4.18, too. > > -aa (vm_29) deliver additional throughput. > If you are running under KDE you should try 3.0 beta2 or -rc2 (!!!) > It flies then. > > Regards, > Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |