Messages in this thread | | | From | "Charles Heselton" <> | Subject | RE: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance | Date | Sat, 9 Mar 2002 17:00:15 -0800 |
| |
How would you implement these thing? I'm not on the same technical level that you guys are, and when/if things are out of context, I don't follow. Can you help?
Charles Heselton Network Installer Staffing Alternatives, Inc. 619.261.6866 charles_heselton@hotmail.com <mailto:charles_heselton@hotmail.com>
-----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Dieter Nützel Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1156 To: Dan Mann Cc: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance
On Saturday, 9. März 2002 18:55:00, Dan Mann wrote: [-] >Machine now feels more responsive than windows 2000 pro machine at work. > > Great work guys.
It's due to preemption and Ingo's great O(1)-scheduler. BIO should help, too but throughput isn't were it should be...;-)
You can get this when you apply preemption+lock-break, O(1) and Andrew Morten's low-latency to 2.4.18, too.
-aa (vm_29) deliver additional throughput. If you are running under KDE you should try 3.0 beta2 or -rc2 (!!!) It flies then.
Regards, Dieter -- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |