lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] generic show_stack facility
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:06:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> said:

Christoph> On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:46:07AM -0800, David Mosberger
Christoph> wrote:
>> Christoph, why do you think the prototype for ia64 is different?

Christoph> I have stopped to wonder why ia64 does things
Christoph> differently.

You might want to reconsider that stance. It could open your mind. ;-)

BTW: this is not at all an ia64-specific issue. It applies to any
arch that doesn't maintain a frame pointer on the stack. Basic
compiler technology.

>> It's because it *has to be*. In general, you can't do a
>> backtrace without having the full (preserved) state of the CPU at
>> the point of which the backtrace begins.

Christoph> So your suggestion is to move the other architectures to
Christoph> the ia64 prototype or to not have an
Christoph> architecture-independand stack-traceback facility at all?

I haven't done such an investigation. I believe the ia64 prototype is
reasonable and probably implementable on all platforms that can unwind
the stack in the first place, but before making a change to the stable
kernel API, I'd think someone would have to investigate this a bit
further.

One issue to consider is whether it's safe to call the routine on a
task that is running on another processor. The ia64 implementation
can handle this gracefully, because it's sometimes better to print a
meaningless (garbled) stack trace than to make provably certain that
the task won't be running on any other CPU. A related question is
whether the routine can be called with interrupts masked.

My sense is this is something that should be considered for 2.5 first.

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.066 / U:11.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site