lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] generic show_stack facility
    On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:46:07AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
    > Christoph, why do you think the prototype for ia64 is different?

    I have stopped to wonder why ia64 does things differently.

    > It's
    > because it *has to be*. In general, you can't do a backtrace without
    > having the full (preserved) state of the CPU at the point of which the
    > backtrace begins.

    So your suggestion is to move the other architectures to the ia64 prototype
    or to not have an architecture-independand stack-traceback facility at all?

    Christoph

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.023 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site