Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:03:30 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: bit ops on unsigned long? |
| |
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100 > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT > /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */ > idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0); > +#endif > >This part of your patch has to go. Every port must >provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless >of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting. >
Even if the port doesn't support CONFIG_PREEMPT at all?
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |