lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: bit ops on unsigned long?
David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */
> idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0);
> +#endif
>
>This part of your patch has to go. Every port must
>provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless
>of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.
>

Even if the port doesn't support CONFIG_PREEMPT at all?

Jeff






-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.080 / U:1.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site