lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: bit ops on unsigned long?
    Date
    In message <3C958332.4050508@mandrakesoft.com> you write:
    > David S. Miller wrote:
    >
    > > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
    > > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100
    > >
    > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
    > > /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */
    > > idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0);
    > > +#endif
    > >
    > >This part of your patch has to go. Every port must
    > >provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless
    > >of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.

    Sorry, slipped in so I could compile on PPC. Discard that part of the
    patch please.

    Thanks,
    Rusty.
    --
    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.047 / U:30.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site