lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: bit ops on unsigned long?
Date
In message <3C958332.4050508@mandrakesoft.com> you write:
> David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */
> > idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0);
> > +#endif
> >
> >This part of your patch has to go. Every port must
> >provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless
> >of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.

Sorry, slipped in so I could compile on PPC. Discard that part of the
patch please.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans