[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: UNDI/PXE for 2.4.x available?
Followup to:  <>
By author: Tobias Wollgam <>
In newsgroup:
> We want to install PCs over ethernet with PXE. For the first boot from
> net we have nothing than the network, we don't know the hardware, so an
> UNDI in the kernel would be perfect. IMHO
> > I think you'll have that problem with any UNDI driver; in either case
> > I suspect that (a) performance will stink no matter what
> That's ok for the things we will do.
> > and (b) it won't work properly with SMP unless you apply really
> > heavy locking.
> Does it matter in our case?

Probably not.

> > The PXE people at Intel really seems enamored with the idea of using
> > the UNDI stack all the way into the operating system;
> We need it not to run an operating system, we need it for the
> installation of an operating system.
> On the other hand, UNDI will deliver a network driver for all PXE-cards
> that come up before there is any direct hardware support. (Ok, then b
> matters)

In theory. In practice, from having dealt with enough PXE stacks, I
would say that it is more likely you're going to have problems getting
the UNDI drivers to work in a Linux environment than you will find
that a fully equipped kernel lacks the drivers you need, especially
since you can update the kernel on the server as needed. There has
been a shakeout in the NIC world, and aren't anywhere near as many in
use now as there was a few years ago -- and anything before then isn't
going to have PXE.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.038 / U:26.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site