lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51
Date
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>It seems useful to me add a colum with CPU%+LCPU%.
>It is intersting to notice that 2.5.41 spend 41+9=50% CPU time
>for compiling and for the io_load while 2.5.42 spend 45+9=54%
>time. Can I say that 2.5.42 is "better" than 2.5.41 ?

No I'm afraid not. The lcpu% cant estimate accurately the cpu% used by the
load while the kernel is actually being compiled as the load starts before
ther kernel compilation and ends after it. This means that lcpu% will always
overestimate the loads' cpu%. I haven't found a workaround for this... yet

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9qLUdF6dfvkL3i1gRAmS/AJ49q1Kd1RBZU8bflVd2n5RUi1Q3UQCffNZI
8V14Cm2/xbXk/QMCCoBnIf4=
=/fVc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.049 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site