Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:27:44 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19 |
| |
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On January 14, 2002 09:33 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > try to replace : > > > > PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() and RT_PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() with : > > > > #define NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(n) (MIN_TIMESLICE + ((MAX_TIMESLICE - \ > > MIN_TIMESLICE) * ((n) + 20)) / 39) > > > > > > NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(p->__nice) > > Not sure about this change. gkrellm shows the compile getting about 40% > cpu. Best result here seems to be with a larger range of timeslices. ie > 1-15 ((10*HZ)/1000...) instead lets the compile get 80% of the cpu. wonder > if this might be the way to go?
What's the MIN/MAX_TIMESLICE range that you used to get 80% of cpu ?
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |