Messages in this thread | | | From | Ed Tomlinson <> | Subject | Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19 | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:19:04 -0500 |
| |
On January 14, 2002 09:33 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > try to replace : > > PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() and RT_PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() with : > > #define NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(n) (MIN_TIMESLICE + ((MAX_TIMESLICE - \ > MIN_TIMESLICE) * ((n) + 20)) / 39) > > > NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(p->__nice)
Not sure about this change. gkrellm shows the compile getting about 40% cpu. Best result here seems to be with a larger range of timeslices. ie 1-15 ((10*HZ)/1000...) instead lets the compile get 80% of the cpu. wonder if this might be the way to go?
Ed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |