lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: major VM suckage with 2.4.10pre12 and 2.4.10pre13 and highmem, we will help test
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1) wrote:

> Kernel 2.4.10pre13 did not help our NFS SPEC testing on a machine with
> 4GB RAM. Refer to my previous message about those results:
> http://lists.insecure.org/linux-kernel/2001/Sep/3036.html
>
> In a nutshell, kswapd starts grabbing 99% of the CPU for long
> stretches in time, which causes us to drop NFS RPC connections, which
> causes performance to suck.

I'm curious, how do recent -ac kernels perform here ?

If you have the time, could you test 2.4.9-ac13 plain
and 2.4.9-ac13 with my page aging and launder patches
from http://www.surriel.com/patches/ ? ;)

cheers,

Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.034 / U:1.256 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site