Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:00:49 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: major VM suckage with 2.4.10pre12 and 2.4.10pre13 and highmem, we will help test |
| |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1) wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.10pre13 did not help our NFS SPEC testing on a machine with > 4GB RAM. Refer to my previous message about those results: > http://lists.insecure.org/linux-kernel/2001/Sep/3036.html > > In a nutshell, kswapd starts grabbing 99% of the CPU for long > stretches in time, which causes us to drop NFS RPC connections, which > causes performance to suck.
I'm curious, how do recent -ac kernels perform here ?
If you have the time, could you test 2.4.9-ac13 plain and 2.4.9-ac13 with my page aging and launder patches from http://www.surriel.com/patches/ ? ;)
cheers,
Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |