Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:51:52 -0700 | From | Mike Castle <> | Subject | Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war |
| |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 06:39:43PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Let's assume it does. Joe Hacker uses the new min macro and uses int > because this_residual is an int. Later he realizes that this_residual > must be an unsigned int. Will he now also automatically change the type > in the min macro?
min (typeof(this_residual), this_residual, foo);
Though I'm not sure this would be accepted into the kernel. :->
mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |