Messages in this thread | | | From | "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <> | Subject | RE: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this) | Date | Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:04:51 -0400 |
| |
Chris, Which patch is the transaction packing patch? My build did have "knfsd-6.g" patch, which does the reiesrfs generation number stuff (attached).
Erik
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Mason [mailto:mason@suse.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:25 AM > To: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1); 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org' > Subject: re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results > sho w this) > > > > > On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK > (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote: > > > Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing > (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results > > I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance > > degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the > hardware constant, > > only changing the kernel. > > Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch? > > -chris >
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream] | |