lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Re: gcc: internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11]
Hi Peter.

>> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?

> Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
> this discussion.

The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to
be confused with the `lock registers` patch for the Intel processors,
and I noted that the processor in question was a Cyrix one, hence the
comment.

Best wishes from Riley.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.131 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site