Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 01 Jul 2001 17:21:32 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [Re: gcc: internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11] |
| |
Riley Williams wrote:
> Hi Peter. > > >> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch? > > > Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of > > this discussion. > > The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to > be confused with the `lock registers` patch for the Intel processors, > and I noted that the processor in question was a Cyrix one, hence the > comment. >
Oh. Sorry, I don't know about "lock halt" and its effects. However, if it refers to the instruction sequence LOCK HLT I find it hard to believe it would have the symptoms described.
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |