lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules?
Date
> If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the
way,
> then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.

What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically
linked
to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme
code
to be GPL'ed too.

I'm neither a lawyer, but this is the difference as I understood.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

-mirabilos
--
EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans