Messages in this thread |  | | From | "mirabilos" <> | Subject | Re: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules? | Date | Wed, 9 May 2001 18:58:47 -0000 |
| |
> If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the way, > then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.
What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically linked to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme code to be GPL'ed too.
I'm neither a lawyer, but this is the difference as I understood. Please correct me if I am wrong.
-mirabilos -- EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |