[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules?
    > If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the
    > then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.

    What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically
    to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme
    to be GPL'ed too.

    I'm neither a lawyer, but this is the difference as I understood.
    Please correct me if I am wrong.

    EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.030 / U:18.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site