lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules?
    mikeg@wen-online.de (Mike Galbraith)  wrote on 13.05.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105131250150.338-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>:

    > On 13 May 2001, Kai Henningsen wrote:
    >
    > > alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) wrote on 09.05.01 in
    > > <E14xZNJ-00033f-00@the-village.bc.nu>:
    > >
    > > > > you stand, it'll cost you around $15K and that, in my opinion, is
    > > > > fine. If it isn't worth $15K to protect your code then it is worth so
    > > > > little to you that there really is no good reason not to just GPL it
    > > > > from the start.
    > > >
    > > > Smart advice.
    > >
    > > Problem is, the people making that decision are not always the people
    > > wanting to distribute the work in question, in which case the argument
    > > doesn't work.
    >
    > if (!cost_analysis) goto darwinism;

    Thank you for completely missing the point.

    MfG Kai
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.023 / U:31.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site