Messages in this thread |  | | Date | 13 May 2001 20:18:00 +0200 | From | (Kai Henningsen) | Subject | Re: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules? |
| |
mikeg@wen-online.de (Mike Galbraith) wrote on 13.05.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105131250150.338-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>:
> On 13 May 2001, Kai Henningsen wrote: > > > alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) wrote on 09.05.01 in > > <E14xZNJ-00033f-00@the-village.bc.nu>: > > > > > > you stand, it'll cost you around $15K and that, in my opinion, is > > > > fine. If it isn't worth $15K to protect your code then it is worth so > > > > little to you that there really is no good reason not to just GPL it > > > > from the start. > > > > > > Smart advice. > > > > Problem is, the people making that decision are not always the people > > wanting to distribute the work in question, in which case the argument > > doesn't work. > > if (!cost_analysis) goto darwinism;
Thank you for completely missing the point.
MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |