[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net #9
On Wed, 30 May 2001 09:32:39 +0000 (UTC), 
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> wrote:
>Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <> writes:
>>-static char name[4][IFNAMSIZ] = { "", "", "", "" };
>>+static char name[4][IFNAMSIZ];
>Ugh. Sure about that one? the variables have been pointers to zero,
>now they're zero...

Bzzt. Arrays and pointers are not always equivalent. This code
defines an area of 4*IFNAMSIZ chars. The old code then initialised
each IFNAMSIZ chars to the empty string (an array starting with '\0'),
not a pointer to an empty string. Test file x.c.

#define IFNAMSIZ 7
static char name[4][IFNAMSIZ];
int main(void) { return(0); }

# gcc -g x.c -o x
# gdb x
(gdb) ptype name
type = char [4][7]
(gdb) x name[0]
0x80494f4 <name>: 0x00000000
(gdb) x name[1]
0x80494fb <name+7>: 0x00000000
(gdb) x name[2]
0x8049502 <name+14>: 0x00000000
(gdb) x name[3]
0x8049509 <name+21>: 0x00000000

Zero initialisation via bss works fine. Try it with
static char name[4][IFNAMSIZ] = {"", "", "", ""};
and you get exactly the same results, at the expense of more disk space
and time to load. Not much extra I know, but it all adds up.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.068 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site