Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 May 2001 18:35:18 +0200 | From | Hermann Himmelbauer <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net #9 |
| |
Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > This is ANSI C standard stuff. If a static object with a scalar type is > > not explicitly initialized, it is initialized to zero by default. > > > > Sure we can get gcc to recognize that case, but why use gcc to work > > around code that avoids an ANSI feature? > > Good standard don't mandate the implementation. And as > somebody doing some other language said, there is more than one way to > do it.
Hmmm, I understand both sides perfectly, but what about that one:
int n; /* n=0 */
Would that be a compromise?
Regards, Hermann
-- ,_, (O,O) "There is more to life than increasing its speed." ( ) -- Gandhi -"-"-------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |