Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:27:56 -0700 | From | TimO <> | Subject | Re: OOPS-kernel 2.4.3-pre1 |
| |
Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, TimO wrote: > > > eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 > [snip] > > >>EIP; c0142a52 <get_new_inode+b2/160> <===== > > Trace; c0142ca6 <iget4+b6/d0> > > Trace; c0145f01 <proc_get_inode+41/120> > > Trace; c014601a <proc_read_super+3a/b0> > > Trace; c01349a4 <read_super+104/180> > > Trace; c0134f7a <kern_mount+2a/80> > > Trace; c0107007 <init+7/110> > > Trace; c01074b8 <kernel_thread+28/40> > > Code; c0142a52 <get_new_inode+b2/160> > > 00000000 <_EIP>: > > Code; c0142a52 <get_new_inode+b2/160> <===== > [snip] > > Lovely. sb->s_op == NULL in iget(). The thing being, proc_read_super() > explicitly sets ->s_op to non-NULL. Oh, and that area hadn't changed since > 2.4.2, so I'd rather suspect the b0rken build. Can you reproduce it? > > Cheers, > Al
Not anymore; rm -rf seems to have fixed it (make mrproper didn't). Guess I should have tried that before posting. Don't know how it got screwed up; only 2 patches applied to this tree.
Thanks,
=============== -- Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |