Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:28:51 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | scheduler params ... |
| |
Linus, after some test i'd suggest to reposition MM_AFFINITY_BONUS to 1 for a better interactive feeling. The other issue is TICK_SCALE()/NICE_TO_TICKS() that does not permit fine tuned time slices. I'd like to try shorter ts but the current shifting implementation does not give enough control over final values. What about having a table :
unsigned char ts_table[];
that is filled in sched_init() and is used like :
p->time_slice = ts_table[20 - p->nice];
The TICK_SCALE()/NICE_TO_TICKS() is no more critical because is now called with a nr_running frequency and no more with a total processes frequency.
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |