Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:44:15 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols??? |
| |
Richard Gooch wrote: > In fact, given the other code in the tree that doesn't conform to > CodingStyle, it makes sense run lindent on the whole tree and make > that available. As long as people understand that they should generate > patches against the real tree, and not the lindented one.
We are slowly Lindenting the -real- tree, actually. So, no, that doesn't make sense. See my mention of long-term maintainability earlier...
WRT to other code, devfs is indeed being picked on, because devfs -clearly- needs other eyes, and devfs is so far from current CodingStyle.
Readability of devfs is IMHO far more important than the readability of drivers/scsi/random_isa_driver.c.
-- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |