lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GPLONLY kernel symbols???
Richard Gooch wrote:
> In fact, given the other code in the tree that doesn't conform to
> CodingStyle, it makes sense run lindent on the whole tree and make
> that available. As long as people understand that they should generate
> patches against the real tree, and not the lindented one.

We are slowly Lindenting the -real- tree, actually. So, no, that
doesn't make sense. See my mention of long-term maintainability
earlier...

WRT to other code, devfs is indeed being picked on, because devfs
-clearly- needs other eyes, and devfs is so far from current
CodingStyle.

Readability of devfs is IMHO far more important than the readability of
drivers/scsi/random_isa_driver.c.

--
Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung
Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue.
MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.110 / U:2.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site