[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...]
>> So would a workable (if naieve) attempt to use Andrea's 
>> memory-zones-grouped-into-classes approach on NUMA just involve making a
>> class/zone list for each node? (Okay, you've got to identify nodes, and
>> group together processors, bridges, DMAable devices, etc, but it seems like
>> that has to be done anyway, class/zone or not.) How does what people want to
>> do for NUMA improve on that?
> I fear it becomes an N! problem.
> I'd like to hear what Andrea has planned since without docs its hard to
> speculate on how the 2.4.10 vm works anyway

Can you describe why it's N! ? Are you talking about the worst possible case,
or a two level local / non-local problem?



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.059 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site