[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...]
> So would a workable (if naieve) attempt to use Andrea's 
> memory-zones-grouped-into-classes approach on NUMA just involve making a
> class/zone list for each node? (Okay, you've got to identify nodes, and
> group together processors, bridges, DMAable devices, etc, but it seems like
> that has to be done anyway, class/zone or not.) How does what people want to
> do for NUMA improve on that?

I fear it becomes an N! problem.

I'd like to hear what Andrea has planned since without docs its hard to
speculate on how the 2.4.10 vm works anyway
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.071 / U:5.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site