Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] | Date | Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:51:44 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> So would a workable (if naieve) attempt to use Andrea's > memory-zones-grouped-into-classes approach on NUMA just involve making a > class/zone list for each node? (Okay, you've got to identify nodes, and > group together processors, bridges, DMAable devices, etc, but it seems like > that has to be done anyway, class/zone or not.) How does what people want to > do for NUMA improve on that?
I fear it becomes an N! problem.
I'd like to hear what Andrea has planned since without docs its hard to speculate on how the 2.4.10 vm works anyway - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |