[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Context switch times
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 04:48:30PM +0300, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
> Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > The idle-task might be (ab-)used for this, because it has perfect
> > data for this.
> >
> > T_SystemElapsed - T_IdleTaskRun = T_CPULoaded
> The problem here is that the idle task doesn't get run at all if there
> are runnable tasks.

There are idle tasks per CPU. If there are runnable tasks and the
idle-task of a CPU is running it, it is not fully loaded at this

No idle task is running, if all CPUs are fully loaded AFAIR.

> One interesting property of the load balancer tasks would be that the
> less heavily loaded CPUs would tend to execute the load balancer more
> often, actively releaving the more heavily loaded CPUs, while those
> would concentrate more on getting the job done. Come to think of it, it
> could be coded in such a way that only the least loaded CPU would
> execute the load balancing algorithm, while the others would simply
> chalk up elapsed times.

So you suggest only one load balancer task jumping from CPU to
CPU. I misunderstood it. _Only_ chalking up could certainly done by
the idle tasks.


Ingo Oeser
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.123 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site