lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.13-pre6 breaks Nvidia's kernel module
Date

drevil@warpcore.org said:
> What I am advocating is a little bit more sanity. The OS should not
> break compatability with existing drivers so often for a 'stable'
> release.

Name a driver in the 2.4.13-pre6 tree which doesn't compile and work with
the 2.4.13-pre6 kernel.

We don't care about binary-only modules. That policy is fixed in stone - if
you don't like it, you are missing the point of what many of us are here
for. In which case, please go away and stop trolling.


On 7 Feb 1999, torvalds@transmeta.com wrote:
> I _refuse_ to even consider tying my hands over some binary-only module.
>
> <...>
>
> Basically, I want people to know that when they use binary-only modules,
> it's THEIR problem. I want people to know that in their bones, and I
> want it shouted out from the rooftops. I want people to wake up in a
> cold sweat every once in a while if they use binary-only modules.

(ref: http://lwn.net/1999/0211/a/lt-binary.html)



--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:10    [W:0.153 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site