[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.10 build failure - atomic_dec_and_lock export
>>>>> " " == Andreas Schwab <> writes:

> Trond Myklebust <> writes:
> |> If you have CONFIG_SMP defined then atomic_dec_and_lock will
> |> never get defined

> Unless you use CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, which causes
> atomic_dec_and_lock to be versioned and defined as a macro via
> <linux/modversions.h>.

Oh great... That's going to confound the test in <linux/spinlock.h>

Urgh. Can anybody propose a less ugly solution than EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS()?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.060 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site