[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Recommended swap for 2.4.x.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44PM -0800, Alan Olsen wrote:
> What is the recommended amount of swap with the 2.4.x kernels?

AFAIK, swap requirements for applications running under a 2.4 kernel have not
changed significantly from 2.2 kernels (please anyone correct me if I'm wrong),
so the basic answer is: About as much as you needed with for a 2.2 kernel.

> The standard rule is usually memory x 2. (But that is more a Solaris
> superstition than anything else.)

This always struck me as the most stupid rule of thumb I'd ever heard of.
With this metric, systems which precisely need swap the most (low-RAM systems)
get the least of it, and those that need it the least (those with gigs of RAM)
get tons of swap they don't need. I don't know how this keeps perpetuating,
as it should be plainly brain damaged to anybody who thinks about it for a
couple of seconds, but somehow it does.

My general recommendation is:
1) Take the best guess you can at how much total memory you're ever going to
need at one time. This can vary with the type of tasks you're doing
(server/desktop/image-editing/etc), the software programs you're using, and
so on. There is no easy way to figure this out, but I would recommend that
if you come up with anything less than 128MB, you're probably being too
2) Subtract the amount of RAM you have (believe it or not, the more RAM you
have, the less swap you need. Imagine that).
3) Round up to a nice breaking point (multiples of 64MB are nice and are easy
to remember), just for convenience.
4) Add a little bit of extra just in case (it's better to have too much than
too little, particularly since disk is cheap). I usually add somewhere
around 64MB.

For most people, for most systems, this comes out somewhere between 128MB and
256MB of swap needed (in some cases you may need 512MB or more, but if you've
got those sorts of memory demands you may want to carefully consider whether
more RAM wouldn't be a good investment). If in doubt, go for the larger
number. After all, with an 8.1GB drive, how much are you going to miss a puny
0.25GB (256MB) chunk of it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:1.112 / U:2.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site