[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
> I read the asm produced by some of some of my testcases.  The current spinlock
> implementation seems to do exactly the _right_ thing in practice and nothing
> more. "memory" was instead causing reloads of constant addresses into registers
> and stuff that shouldn't be necessary (I was infact wondering about the reason
> of those suprious loads also in my first email).

What version of gcc? Recently some work was done to improve the handling
of constant memory.

-- John
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.082 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site