Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:03:40 -0700 | From | George Anzinger <> | Subject | Unlocked printk() var_args question |
| |
I would like to provide a new printk() (unlocked_printk()) that does not take any locks. This would be used by panic() and the like, were we don't care about the locks an _REALLY_ want to get the message out.
What I am proposing is that printk() take the locks and then call unlocked_printk(), i.e. share the real body of printk(). The problem I am having is in how to set up the var_args call. Does anyone know how to pass var_args comming in on to the inner function?
Also, another mystery, how, where, does printk.c include std_args.h?
George - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |