lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Low Latency Patch
Date
From
Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> said.

[...]

> The low latency patch, which really significantly improves not only
> the usability of the kernel for real-time audio/video applications but
> also improves the general feel and functionality in a heavily loaded
> environment,

But Linus has already stated that the cost in the present form is way too
high for the win. Most kernel gurus agree...

> and something that significantly affects security as the Solar Design
> patches

Which give _no_ additional security (some script kiddies are now using
exploits that work even with them applied, just think what will happen if
all kernels are "securized": Esploits will work around that, and the cost
in the kernel stays forever).

> do, are both things that significantly increase the functionality of the
> kernel relative to the degree that they detract from maintainability.

That is definitely not your call to make for Linus' own kernel tree.
--
Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.066 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site