Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:57:29 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Mike A. Harris" <> | Subject | Re: Linux GPL violations. |
| |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Andreas Bombe wrote:
>> Correct, however unless their own source includes GPL they don't >> need to provide THEIR source. > >Correct. But the GPL code is still there, and that's what it's all >about.
Certainly. Any GPL code requires source availability.
>> Only source of GPL and any >> modifications. Providing source can be as simple as saying >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/ in an email... > >No. Read clause 3 of the GPL. Distributions of executables generated >from GPL code require it to be accompanied either with the source or a >written offer for the source. They have to make the offer, not wait for >email.
Correct. However, in practice, unmodified sources are often acceptibly pointed to from their originating source. This allows one to obtain the latest sources as well. They are required nonetheless to provide source themselves should someone want it, but in practice pointing out where it is available online is usually is technically what someone is looking for. They are required however, as you state.
There has been discussion lately about loosening the wording of the GPL so that one can point out somewhere on the internet that the exact source they've used is located to meet the source requirement. Changing world...
>If they go for the written offer, they have to distribute the sources >themselves. Referring to those sources from which you got the >unmodified code is only valid for noncommercial distribution (clause >3.c). Selling a hardware/software combination looks quite commercial to >me.
Yes, that is the legal wording of the GPL, but in practice, if someone shows where it can be obtained, most people are sane enough to get it from there. If they can't however for whatever reason - if just to prove a point, they can of course get it from the company directly by means of the GPL requirement.
>It's the distributors task to offer the source, not the receiver's to >find out by luck that there is GPL'd code in the product so that they >may ask for source.
Absolutely.
-- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate Computer Consultant GNU advocate Capslock Consulting Open Source advocate
... Our continuing mission: To seek out knowledge of C, to explore strange UNIX commands, and to boldly code where no one has man page 4.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |