Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:04:38 +0000 (GMT) | From | Riley Williams <> | Subject | Re: io_request_lock and system performance (can it be replaced?) |
| |
Hi Alan.
> In part the lock should only be held very briefly so it > shouldnt be that contented.
I'm not sure whether the locks should be contented or not, but I would suspect the maintainers and developers would brefer to be contented...
I would presume you meant "contenDed" though...
Best wishes from Riley.
* Copyright (C) 2000, Memory Alpha Systems. * All rights and wrongs reserved.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux | | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, | | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone | | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ * http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |