Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:29:41 -0700 | From | Richard Gooch <> | Subject | Re: io_request_lock and system performance (can it be replaced?) |
| |
Riley Williams writes: > Hi Alan. > > > In part the lock should only be held very briefly so it > > shouldnt be that contented. > > I'm not sure whether the locks should be contented or not, but I > would suspect the maintainers and developers would brefer to be ^ > contented... > > I would presume you meant "contenDed" though...
Yes, I would Prefer that we all made no spelling mistakes.
Regards,
Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |