lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: io_request_lock and system performance (can it be replaced?)
Riley Williams writes:
> Hi Alan.
>
> > In part the lock should only be held very briefly so it
> > shouldnt be that contented.
>
> I'm not sure whether the locks should be contented or not, but I
> would suspect the maintainers and developers would brefer to be
^
> contented...
>
> I would presume you meant "contenDed" though...

Yes, I would Prefer that we all made no spelling mistakes.

Regards,

Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.315 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site