lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CodingStyle update (was Re: URL to the latest /proc/driver/microcode)
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> James Manning wrote:
> > Good point Tigran... since it's officially preferred, it would appear to
> > be a good candidate for CodingStyle inclusion. What do you think?
>
> IMHO, you are absolutely right.
>
> > +struct struct_type foo = {
> > + field1: initializer1,
> > + field2: initializer2,
> > + field3: initializer3,
> > +}
> > +
> > +The trailing comma on the last line allows for a homogenous look and easy
> > +rearrangement (eg for later blocking of some members in an #ifdef).
>
> Thanks - I always wondered if it makes any difference to put the last
> comma or not.

it depends on the compiler. I have used at least one that emits a big
nasty warning if one does that, so its not really portable.

However, I prefer this style as well, so I usually look for a way to
disable that particular warning... ;)

ron

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.269 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site