Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:06:55 -0600 | From | Ron Flory <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle update (was Re: URL to the latest /proc/driver/microcode) |
| |
Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > James Manning wrote: > > Good point Tigran... since it's officially preferred, it would appear to > > be a good candidate for CodingStyle inclusion. What do you think? > > IMHO, you are absolutely right. > > > +struct struct_type foo = { > > + field1: initializer1, > > + field2: initializer2, > > + field3: initializer3, > > +} > > + > > +The trailing comma on the last line allows for a homogenous look and easy > > +rearrangement (eg for later blocking of some members in an #ifdef). > > Thanks - I always wondered if it makes any difference to put the last > comma or not.
it depends on the compiler. I have used at least one that emits a big nasty warning if one does that, so its not really portable.
However, I prefer this style as well, so I usually look for a way to disable that particular warning... ;)
ron
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |