Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:07:45 -0500 | From | James Manning <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle update (was Re: URL to the latest /proc/driver/microcode) |
| |
[ Friday, February 18, 2000 ] Ingo Oeser wrote: > Aehm, which one has been accepted? > The C99 stuff or the GCC specific one?
Linus accepted the gcc version of the patch.
> I currently prefer the C99-like syntax, because it makes _much_ > more sense as you usally write [snip] > But maybe this is just a matter of taste ;)
It is... of the places that were using named initializrs, they were using gcc syntax (this making the gcc patch a smaller one, which may have helped its chances). The perl script I posted can still convert them to C99, so if Linus ever changes his mind, switching between the two will be a quick procedure :)
James
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |