Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Nov 2000 21:48:59 -0500 (EST) | From | "Mike A. Harris" <> |
| |
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:11:57 +0000 (GMT) >From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> >To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> >Cc: Tomasz Motylewski <motyl@stan.chemie.unibas.ch>, > Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: Re: ide-probe.c:400: `rtc_lock' undeclared and > /lib/modules/..../build > >> Agreed, I was unhappy that the build symlink was added to 2.2 kernels. >> Now you need modutils >= 2.3.14 for 2.2 kernels :(. But nobody asks >> me, I'm just the kernel module.[ch] and modutils maintainer. > >Actually they do. I agree that it wants sorting. Im just wondering what the >best approach is - maybe check modutils rev and only add the link if its high >enough ?
What if build-machine != machine-kernel-was-built-for?
---------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: My new email address is: mharris@opensourceadvocate.org
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." - Aldous Huxley
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |