lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
>From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
>Cc: Tomasz Motylewski <motyl@stan.chemie.unibas.ch>,
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: ide-probe.c:400: `rtc_lock' undeclared and
> /lib/modules/..../build
>
>> Agreed, I was unhappy that the build symlink was added to 2.2 kernels.
>> Now you need modutils >= 2.3.14 for 2.2 kernels :(. But nobody asks
>> me, I'm just the kernel module.[ch] and modutils maintainer.
>
>Actually they do. I agree that it wants sorting. Im just wondering what the
>best approach is - maybe check modutils rev and only add the link if its high
>enough ?

What if build-machine != machine-kernel-was-built-for?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: My new email address is: mharris@opensourceadvocate.org

Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
- Aldous Huxley


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.048 / U:3.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site