[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of

    On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > Even 2.2.x can be fixed to do the wake-one for accept(), if required.
    > Do we really want to retrofit wake_one to 2.2. I know Im not terribly keen to
    > try and backport all the mechanism. I think for 2.2 using the semaphore is a
    > good approach. Its a hack to fix an old OS kernel. For 2.4 its not needed

    We don't need to backport of the full exclusive wait queues: we could do
    the equivalent of the semaphore inside the kernel around just accept(). It
    wouldn't be a generic thing, but it would fix the specific case of

    Otherwise we're going to have old binaries of apache lying around forever
    that do the wrong thing..


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.019 / U:14.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site