[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange
> > Instead, if apache had just done the thing it wanted to do in the first
> > place, the wake-one accept() semantics would have happened a hell of a
> > lot earlier.
> counter-example: freebsd had wake-one semantics a few years before linux.

And Im sure apache authors can use the utsname() syscall 8)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.159 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site