Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Nov 2000 14:30:47 +0100 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4? |
| |
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:27:13PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> > Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:26:49 +0100 > > Or is timestamp 0 a legal value? > > It is legal.
NetBSD ignores 0 timestamps. Although that's a hack it is IMHO a reasonable one and Linux should probably do it too. Even when the 0 is generated legitimately by wrapping counters it is probably not a big problem to lose timestamps for such few packets.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |