lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:27:13PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:26:49 +0100
>
> Or is timestamp 0 a legal value?
>
> It is legal.

NetBSD ignores 0 timestamps. Although that's a hack it is IMHO a reasonable one and
Linux should probably do it too. Even when the 0 is generated legitimately by wrapping
counters it is probably not a big problem to lose timestamps for such few packets.


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.036 / U:0.984 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site