lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?
Date
In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0011101435140.11937-100000@artemis.cam.zeus.com> you wrote:
> The cobalt machines have now had a kernel upgrade (only to 2.2.14, thats
> the most recent that Cobalt provide...), and the problem has
> disappeared.

Should we ignore "timestamp 0" if there are systems out there which will
break on that. Or is timestamp 0 a legal value?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.037 / U:4.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site