Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:01:48 -0200 (/usr/local/glibc) | From | Blu3Viper <> | Subject | Re: [Semi-OT,important] ORBS globally blocks users of these lists |
| |
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > If you dont like it go found a linux-full-of-spam mailing list set. You can > sit and enjoy your own little spam filled world the rest of us wont read.
I don't like spam.
> What would be far more constructive would be if specific hosts that are secure > got together and figured a policy for publishing an "ok" list based on a > trust scheme that could be queried too.
I'm all for anti-spam when it's done right.
> I'm just disappointed that if you speak for VA then VA's response to people > trying to stop spam is two fingers and an attempt to blame them for other > peoples problems.
You missed my qualifier. I asked that ORBS not be used while they practice their policy of global blacklisting. I fully support ORBS in it's efforts to stop spam by affecting the broken systems. Any servers on Above.net address space that are open should be listed. The other hundreds of thousands should remain fully free. Especially when the ones I touch are listed in the database as anti-spam compliant.
I draw the line when they shoot the whole city just to stop a dozen people.
I don't speak as a rep from VA. Nor is this a paltry face for spam. In my view, VA's position on spam is great. Nobody likes spam. I'm not blaming anyone for other people's problems. I'm saying ORBS is practicing a group prejudice.
Not everyone in the world has the freedom to choose a different provider. That anti-spam abiding citizen shouldn't have to face the blacklist because his provider has blocked ORBS from testing.
My mail server XYZ is anti-spam compliant and listed as such in the ORBS database, why then is it being blacklisted?
linux-kernel isn't about stereotype programming, we go through pains to make sure the kernel operates for as many types as possible. We aren't intentionally refusing to write support simply because of bias. We can't [currently] provide industrial crypto in the mainstream kernel in US locations, but there are patches on the outside of the US that people can get.
Is generic blacklisting right?
-d
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |