Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:04:47 -0400 | From | "M.Berglund" <> | Subject | Fw: Betr.: Re: Betr.: Re: Shortening the Development Cycle... |
| |
Well, I am only a lUser who keeps up with what goes on here, but I am of the opinion that a more diffinitive break between stable and release might be a good thing. I have to admit, the FreeBSD method is kind of nice. Certainly is logical from one point of view. I also realise that this creates a managment situation that may not be easy to deal with.
Food for thought.
M. Berglund
Great, Why don't we take MORE advice from the galactically stupid! --Tom Cruise
************************************* Original message from: dstein@phoenixcontact.com >Ah, excuse me, please. I think missed the original subject of this message - I >also subscribed this morning to the list and did not get the first one of this >mails. > >Of course, new hardware drivers could be best tested within a new kernel. I >think, this differences the dev-kernels form the stable ones and of course it >makes no sense to include very new drivers into an existing stable kernel >release... it maybe rather complicated to difference a kernel breakdown from a >driver breakdown, but this might only be a complicated thing to me ;-) > >By the way: are my messages in HTML- or plaintext-format? I don't know, which >format is used by this browser based notes mailing system, so excuse any >HTML-messages - I will correct this if needed. > >Dietmar > > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |