Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: The Linux Kernel Project Management System (INITIAL PROPOSAL) | Date | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:10:09 +0000 | From | Peter Miller <> |
| |
Larry McVoy writes > On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 04:41:57PM -0400, Jordan Mendelson wrote: > > I actually did take a look at it a while back, but I sort of > > like Aegis better because it allows a push (and pull) model > > of source distribution and distributed repositories.
> Furthermore, it seems that the push/pull model is supported by BK (in > fact, that's the only model supported):
Sorry, you misunderstand...
Aegis supports both push and pull for the primary -> secondary transfer, although pull would certainly be the most common. The man pages you cite appear to say Bitkeeper only supports pull for this.
Aegis also supports both push and pull for the secondary -> primary transfer, although push would be the most common. The man pages you cite appear to say Bitkeeper only supports push for this.
Regards Peter Miller E-Mail: millerp@canb.auug.org.au /\/\* WWW: http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/ Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are personal and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of my employer or the opinions of my colleagues.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |